{{ (moduleVm.actions && moduleVm.changeStatus) ? moduleVm.status : '' }} Identifying Hospitalized Patients at Risk for Harm: A Comparison of Nurse Perceptions vs. Electronic Risk Assessment Tool Scores
Activity Steps
{{ evaluation.question.text }}
{{choice.text}}
{{evaluation.answerSet[0].text}}
Purpose of Activity
To present the details of a study done to compare patients identified as of concern by bedside nurses during safety huddles with those identified as at high risk for harm by an electronic risk assessment tool in real time.Learning Objectives
After completing this continuing education activity you will be able to:
- identify the purpose and methods of the authors' study.
- compare the results of both methods used to identify patients at high risk for harm.
Disclosures
The authors and planners have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Price:
$17.95
Credits:
- ANCC 1.5 CH
- DC - BON 1.5 CH
- KY-BON 1.5 CH
- GA - BON 1.5 CH
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. This activity is also provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider Number CEP 11749. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is also an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the District of Columbia Board of Nursing, Florida Board of Nursing, and Georgia Board of Nursing, #50-1223. Your certificate is valid in all states.
{{ evaluation.question.text }}
{{choice.text}}
{{evaluation.answerSet[0].text}}
Test Code: AJN0417A
Published: Apr 2017
Expires: 12/31/2026
Sources:
AJN, American Journal of Nursing
Required Passing Score: 14/20 (70%)
Specialties:
Medical-Surgical,
Research